Facebook advertising moves towards ‘touch’ as the new ‘push’

December 23rd, 2009 | Leave a comment

Kudos to Facebook. They’ve stumbled on a redefinition of advertising that seems potentially palatable for the consumer and useful for big brands and small businesses alike.

On the social web, where we select our communities and our friends and expect conversant interactions, interruptive push advertising is basically spam, whether it be a video ad, a banner or an unsolicited email. What Facebook is doing is building an ecosystem where scattershot is unacceptable, generic is ineffective, and it is possible to match effectively seller and buyer in a near social manner. Successful advertising on Facebook will be focused on ‘touch’ as a point of interaction and conversation rather than ‘push’ as an interruption and distraction.

Let’s step back and look at what Facebook has done.

Facebook has created through a free social network what the print and TV industries have been trying to do for generations. That is freely acquired, detailed demographics on the background, interests, affiliations, and relationship status for 350M individuals. And with, this the idea of advertising, both agency and individual suddenly have a new direction. Companies can offer information and products to you when you are looking for something and talking about it to your friends in a venue outside of search and keywords.

For as long as there has been products and audiences, the seller has tried to know more about their customers so they can target messages directly to the right customer at the right time. If you are single, you are probably OK to see a dating ad or planning a trip, travel insurance, and so on. The best advertising venues delivered the largest audience with the most specific demographics, but the match was never precise.

Here’s the beauty of the Facebook ecosystem from a pure marketing perspective—everything we as users share with our friends to create relationships and community, are the precise data that advertisers want:

* where we live

* what we read

* where we travel and what we eat

* religion, political beliefs, movies, music likes

* schools, clubs, organizations

* links to outside sites

* basically everything we share

Wow. A goldmine of value.

And this information costs nothing to acquire. Goodbye survey companies. It is now self-selecting. When Facebook pushes keyword search to the top, another new paradigm will emerge as well.

No wonder that a large chunk of Facebook’s $1B in revenue is from advertising.

I’m not a big user of advertising in my businesses. Social tools are more precise, more delicate and more to my liking. But what Facebook has done unlocks new avenues for communicating in a social way. My markets are on Facebook and I’m open to ways to reach them.

Three ideas bubble up around Facebook’s paradigm of what I call ‘touch’ vs. ‘push’ advertising.

First, what Facebook is starting to solve, albeit in a contained network, is the authentification problem. Online, with search you are either an IP address or a cookie. With Facebook you are a person with a face. No longer does the advertiser need to ‘boil the ocean’. It’s possible that advertising is moving to a direct marketing or even moreso a personal conversation between a brand and a consumer.

Second, advertising is potentially more than a tool of brute force. No reason to yell if you are talking one-to-one or one-to-a-few that fits a chosen demographic. The self service ad tool lets you precisely target, set your spend and adjust your ad to your chosen group of individuals.

And third, this drives the need for more creative, more specific and a more participatory approach towards ads and campaigns. I believe that today the world is moving towards being 100% customer driven. If you can find me when I’m planning a trip, changing my residence, planning my movie watching for the holidays, then I will pay attention to offers and campaigns that are interesting and engaging and thoughtful. If not, I’ll just ignore or block them. Even in advertising under this model, the consumer can decide what they see.

Facebook makes these three ideas a reality.

Social media and the social web demand new business models. As socialization and democratic venues arise, how companies converse with us needs to change. There are entire new economies, like game microcurrencies, and affiliate networks, then there has always been…advertising.

What Facebook appears to be discovering is that with open demographics, data driven, self-service tools, advertising can be reconfigured to be a useful touch point and an offshoot to conversation rather than an intrusive push interruption.

Share:
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Slashdot
  • email
  • Print
  • Great article Arnold,

    To add to your comments about the authentication problem, another benefit is that no matter where I am, and what computer I am on, it's always me! When I go from home to work to my wife's business computer, it doesn't matter what my IP address is or if I have up-to-date cookies. Although individual authentication is valuable, they shouldn't forget to use IP addresses as well. For instance, the business traveller could be on the road for a couple of weeks and the IP address could be tracked to provide localized advertising. If social media does not stay on top of trends and looking for new models, they will slowly die away. All you have to do is look at Yahoo!/Google, MySpace/FaceBook etc, to see that if someone becomes too complacent, they WILL get left behind!
  • Point well taken Larry.

    Check out another post on measuring social media performance as I dug into this in some depth. http://arnoldwaldstein.com/201... It is not a simple matter.

    BTW--followed your link-100 Mile House! Long time ago, I lived in a bunch of spots in the N. Okanagan--Lumby and Grindrod and Mara to name three obscure ones. I hold a very fond spot for my time there.

  • Now to comment on your BC past. How does someone go from living in Lumby, Grindrod, & Mara end up in Bay/LA/NYC? I was born and raised just outside of Vancouver and moved to Lillooet in 1994 and then up to where we are now in 2005. My wife owns a coffee shop and I work for the phone company in 100 Mile House, but we actually live on Green Lake (70 Mile House) This is our view: http://tinyurl.com/y93yokf

    It's so busy down in the Vancouver area now, I prefer to just avoid the place. The benefit of the internet is I can just go online and visit without spending all of the fuel to get there. We use Xplornet satellite for our connection for the past 4 1/2 years since moving from Lillooet, that had DSL. This was our summer place until we moved in '05. Our girls have enjoyed vacationing and living here, but the distance to town can be challenging.
  • Thanks for the pic. Beautiful.

    Feel free to connect to me through Linked In, if you are interested in my professional wanderings as that tracks some.

    Post grad school in English at UBC, I spent a number of years in the North Okanagan where my son was born, writing mostly and building homes and musical instruments for a living. I've thought about documenting those incredible times...sometimes maybe.
  • Your correct that it is not a simple matter. I've been around computers since the C64 days, and online since MindLink was 3 lines going into the sysop's 2 bedroom apartment and Compuserve was the leading online information provider. Throughout that time-line, most of the people that I knew had a vision of what something could be and weren't afraid to try and fail (Amiga?) at whatever venture they thought that looked interesting. Take the difference between Twitter and Facebook. Facebook does have an advertising model. Twitter, so far, has no advertising hence no revenue stream. It gets right back to basics, if you can't make money and put food on the table, it's not going to last long.

    I had this vision once that I could create an online town, where everyone had a storefront. You could choose to go in and see what was available, chat with the clerks, chat with other customers, make purchases and carry on going through town. I don't think that we're quite to that point yet but maybe in the future!
  • Thanks for sharing Larry.

    Re: business model. I'll be posting soon on the process of 'Discovery' not just for marketing but also for business model development. I'm a firm believer that the way to a model is to focus on the value of an interaction first and a model with a transaction will follow. Twitter found the former; the latter is coming.

    Grab an email subscription to the blog and you'll get a sense of the what I think when that post comes out.

    I touched on some of these aspects in a series of comments I made to an article in The Economist. Please take a look if you'd like:

    http://www.economist.com/node/...
  • Excellent article, Arnold. I wanted to comment on one component where you outline the characteristics that Facebook collects:

    You outlined the following items:

    * where we live

    * what we read

    * where we travel and what we eat

    * religion, political beliefs, movies, music likes

    * schools, clubs, organizations

    * links to outside sites

    * basically everything we share


    I remember speaking with a specific ad networking that was performing quite well for me. They wanted three things in order to sell to a customer: (i) sex, (ii) location, (iii) age. To me this sounded as if we really haven't progressed much since the dawn of internet chat rooms. Kind of ironic in my opinion.

    In addition to the items you outlined, something to think about is that Facebook may know more about yourself than do. How? Because Facebook logs historical data and tendencies.

    Let's say you're an average, geeky high school gal looking to break in with the "cool girl" crowd. The geeky girl may have a tendency to click on the "cool girl" crowd more than she would her average friends. Facebook then logs this data, and they market products to the geek that are based on keywords found in the "cool girl's" profile.
  • Scott.

    Thanks for your comments and pls feel free to link to your own blogs on this topic to stimulate sharing of ideas.

    Yes, you are correct. Two areas that Facebook has not capitalized on yet (and I'm certain there are others) is first to scrape the wall information into algorithms to show direction and characteristics beyond the data itself. And second as you point out is the interpretation of the data behavioral to point to trends that are implied.

    Great stuff. Thnx for coming round and sharing.
  • Well said Arnold, this is precisely the problem we're working on at Victus Media, although from a twitter status perspective (first). As data becomes unbottled from social sharing users can opt in to relevant social search applications.

    Beyond the timing, and contextual relevancy of an ad to your latest status update, perhaps your friend (connected by Disqus comment sharing) has given a review of an awesome product that would greatly aid your search. Social semantic search can allow you see what's most relevant, in addition to serving up directly related ads.

    In this way we can begin to see ads as content, or at the very least meaningful information.

    We are closing the loop now, using Google's real time search (and soon their social search) to connect you with relevant information to semantic extracted keywords from your own social updates. or those of your friends (or those you follow), or those you list (keep track of).
  • Hi Mark.

    So basically social semantic search connecting with info or advertising feeds. This is the holy grail and what we all need--from consumer to advertiser, from large brand to blogger with some affiliate connections.

    Facebook is doing it from a controlled context. Ever so harder to accomplish on the open web.

    Keep me in the loop on this Mark. I'm not the technical guy on the block but as a market maker and consultant to entrepreneurs on business models this is always top of mind for me.

    Thnx as always for your input.
  • We definitely share a vision for how this space is going to develop. You can always catch up on some of my thoughts at Victus Media, or at our service http://imm.victusmedia.com, or our new parallel development windowed environment, http://victus-imm.heroku.com (love user controlled environments and this was a fun for the lead tech Tyler to chew through with a javascript library he's enjoying).
  • Will check the links out Mark. Thnx.
    Have a great holiday.

blog comments powered by Disqus