The wisdom of the community

February 13th, 2010 | Leave a comment

Picture 1

All roads are leading to a community-based information ecosystem on the social web. This is the beginning of what could be called the Wisdom of the Community.

The intersection of the real-time Internet, the social web, personal networks and dynamic conversation platforms, has entrenched social as the basic language of online interactions and communities as the nexus of all activities.

This is not the traditional Wisdom of the Crowds idea. That theory always seemed impersonal, anonymous and flat to me. Crowd-based collaborative and important milestones like Wikipedia broke new ground but this was never a community of people. Useful but not truly social.

A lot has changed. Internet technology has enabled it but people have embraced the inherent power in real-time online communications and behavior has changed accordingly including how we acquire information and value it. I’ve blogged on this recently.

We’ve moved from anonymous to transparent personas, from pseudonyms to public profiles, from closed to open networks and from static, one-sided exchanges of the forum world to dynamic fluid conversations built on Disqus and other systems. And smart people like my friends Mark Essel and David Semeria are blogging and creating platforms that build on and extend from these ideas.

In a phrase, we’ve become more social by nature and that social, open poise has driven communities to form around rock star bloggers, topics and neighborhoods. And around each of us as well.

But the change I think is larger and more far-reaching and touches on how we value and receive information and decide on what to purchase.

Yelp is a good example. It’s certainly social but Foursquare as a community network of recommendations will trump it over time. When your friend says the expresso at their local spot is great, and updates that information dynamically (with daily specials and coupons)  that is more valuable than a disconnected personal comment on Yelp by some stranger.

Or wrapping social into search by interweaving Twitter streams with Google search makes everything more pertinent and real time. But I’m much more interested in the recommendations of my networks.

Or compare the recommendations from Amazon readers to the value of a friend on Facebook going on about a book they read. No comparison.

I think that Yelp and Amazon and scads of travel sites will either get smart and build filters to move from random social recommendations to our personal and authenticated social nets or a plethora of scrappy smart folks like Foursquare will shift the balance of power and eat their breakfast (and post on it in real time to their friends if they liked it :) ).

Social noise is not the same as community value.

And this is the evolutionary process on steroids:

  • From the impersonal world of transactional e-commerce and catalogs
  • To the anonymous crowd
  • To the authenticated and known
  • To the social and personal
  • To the dynamic community as the center of our socializing, learning and purchasing networks

The Wisdom of the Community speaks to a dynamic, personal and smart ecosystem that is in itself, a filter of the net’s and the world’s information. Each of us creates their own network and people filter and create information that works in strata of value around each of us at the center of our respective communities.

It’s the intersection of communal and personal. For everyone. And that is what makes it work.

Share:
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Slashdot
  • email
  • Print
  • Arnold -

    This is a wise and thoughtful post. I agree that the wisdom of "crowds" and has seemed impersonal - it's also been used to talk about social and political action: yet, crowds are not always right, nor kind! This idea of community wisdom, and how it connects to the person reminds me of another phrase, "the personal is political" -- and here, the personal is the binding matter for community.

    Thank you for for pointing this out - it's important to remember, and to support!
  • Thnx Sarah..I like the 'personal is political' connection.

  • kshapero
    As we live all over, I see more and more where social networking is going. But can it ever replace personal contact?
  • Hi Ken

    No but in my opinion it certainly augments it...by letting us know more about the people we know or meet in the real world of the street. Information is free and omnipresent so our ability to know people better before we meet or augment that personal knowledge later is true.

    And it makes it easier to meet people. I've made friends online that I will certainly seek out to meet them now. This would have not happened without the dynamic possibilities of social engagement online.

  • kshapero
    Yes, I like that. Old world computer social networking was akin to ethical trolling (looking for love in all the wrong places) but we have moved forward and beyond that to something truly dynamic that allows for real relationships as only defined by the parties involved. Then on to personal meetups when possible.
  • You got it.

    The line between on and offline has blurred. Not in some virtual world way but as a real connection between info and relationships that extends both ways.

    People are more informed (as David above commented) and basically more civil.

    Good stuff in my opinion.

  • Fantastic post Arnold, and thanks for the kind words.

    You nailed it with the transition from anonymous to personal, combined with the many-to-many communication now possible on many platforms.

    It's fascinating to think about the implications of all this. People are forming impromptu communities based around shared interests and mutual respect. The resulting conversations are simply more interesting than those which occur when the only common denominator is physical proximity.

    I believe the web is making us all - if not smarter - at least much better informed about the subjects we care about. And that's all down to the phenomena you describe.
  • Thnx David

    These personal, intersecting, shared communities are changing how we learn, interact with people, conduct business and make new friends. And yes, both on and offline. Powerful and inspiring stuff.

    For folks like yourself, and Mark, who are envisioning and building the apps and platforms of tomorrow, I think these new dynamic community baselines empower you to create what was previously unimaginable.

    All this makes work--and life--more interesting all the time.


  • Now that you've pointed out the power of social and recommendation engines, I'm taking another look at refining social gravity. Not only will it enable conversations about topics, but give users to ability to filter their own social streams (lists, friends) for specific topics. It should only be a few lines of code. Thanks Arnold, for reminding me what matters most in the expanding social web, trust and friendship.
  • Hi Mark

    Social Gravity is a sticky term and a compelling idea. It was in the back of my head when I pounded out this post this morning.

    The idea of filtering social streams and moving beyond social noise to community value and wisdom is a good tune to dance to.

    Great having this ongoing discussion Mark. It's healthy and drives thoughts forward.

blog comments powered by Disqus